Agency > Intelligence
For a long time, I believed intelligence was the main thing that mattered.
Probably because everything around me said so. School. Tests. Rankings. Media. The quiet worship of IQ. The idea that smart people naturally win, and everyone else plays catch-up.
That belief was wrong.
Intelligence matters. But agency decides outcomes. Agency is rarer. And more powerful.
Agency is the sense that you can move your life. That your mind belongs to you. That when something breaks, you donāt freeze and wait for instructions. You act, adjust, and keep going.
Put simply: agency is what intelligence needs in order to work.
Why intelligence gets overrated?
We love intelligence because it feels clean. Measurable. Safe.
An exam score tells you whoās āgood.ā A degree signals competence. A credential calms anxiety. You did the right thing, followed the path, checked the box. Agency does none of that.
Agency feels messy. Uncertain. Risky. You donāt get permission slips for it. So cultures tend to reward intelligence and suppress agency, often without meaning to.
We educate for compliance far more than initiative. We hire for resumes instead of judgment. We optimize for correctness instead of adaptability.
Then we act surprised when people freeze outside structured environments. You're literally an RL agent in an environment.
What agency actually looks like?
Agency has nothing to do with being loud or dominant.
High-agency people are often quiet. They donāt need constant validation. They donāt confuse credentials with capability. They see a problem and think, āIāll figure something out,ā then actually do it. Agency can be described as ābeing the subject of the sentence instead of the object.ā
High-agency people respond, redirect, interfere.
Agency survives the future
Everyone keeps saying most skills will be irrelevant in 10 or 20 years. Maybe thatās true. Maybe it isnāt. Either way, it misses the point.
A high-agency person doesnāt anchor their identity to a single skill. They know skills can be learned. Dropped. Rebuilt. They donāt panic when industries shift. They adapt faster than the shift itself. Replace them once, and they reappear somewhere else, with different tools and the same internal engine.
Thatās why agency compounds across time, while skills decay.
Why many people never develop it?
Agency doesnāt appear automatically.
If your environment rewarded obedience over curiosity, you probably learned to wait. If survival depended on approval, you learned conformity. None of that makes you weak. It makes you trained.
The problem is that conformity feels like safety long after it stops being useful. You end up with strong opinions you never tested. Beliefs borrowed wholesale from culture. Goals chosen because they were prestigious, not because they were yours.
Thatās not agency. Thatās pre-installed software.
Conformity as the default state
Most people never consciously choose their operating system. Beliefs come preloaded. Ideas feel true because theyāre popular. Opinions get absorbed through repetition, not investigation. Thatās efficient for societies. Itās terrible for individuals.
The truth is found by those in constant revolt, not violent revolt, but intellectual revolt. The refusal to outsource perception.
Agency begins where conformity ends.
Iteration without permission
Hereās a clean way to recognize agency.
High-agency people iterate without asking first. They try. Observe. Adjust. Try again. No committee approval and perfect plan. Most people act once. When it doesnāt work, they retreat back into comfort and call it realism.
Agency shows up in repetition. Writing after nobody reads. Building after something fails. Learning after looking stupid.
Iteration filters out almost everyone.
Life as an experiment
Low-agency people treat life like a script. High-agency people treat it like a lab. They form hypotheses about their own future. They test ideas in small ways. They expect failure as data, not identity damage. That mindset alone separates creators from spectators.
When someone else promises you success through a formula, agency quietly disappears. You follow instructions. When it breaks, you blame the system and stop.
The experiment mindset flips that. You own the process, not just the outcome.
Believing in the difficult
Agency doesnāt mean believing everything is possible. It means believing difficult things are worth attempting. Thereās a big difference. Easy goals need no agency. You already know how to do them. Impossible goals paralyze most people before they start.
Difficult goals sit in the middle. They require growth. Skill acquisition. Time. Society trains people to mislabel difficult goals as impossible. Once that pattern sets in, people endure lives they could have changed. Agency interrupts that loop.
Why this matters now?
Modern life rewards passivity better than ever. Endless feeds. Algorithmic thinking. Outsourced decisions. Infinite distraction. Agency requires friction and deliberate choices. It requires deciding what matters before someone else decides for you.
Thatās uncomfortable. Thatās why itās rare.
If thereās one thing worth cultivating for the rest of your life, itās AGENCY.
-alok